High penalty risk for obliged entities regardless of actual cases of Money Laundering or Terrorist Financing

High penalty risk for obliged entities regardless of actual cases of Money Laundering or Terrorist Financing

In the context of money laundering and terrorist financing prevention, companies and individuals classified as obligated entities under the Money Laundering Act (Geldwäschegesetz, GwG) face a significant penalty risk. Interestingly, this risk persists even in the absence of actual cases of money laundering or terrorist financing.

Penalty Risk

  • Obligations: Obliged entities, which include financial institutions, lawyers, notaries, real estate agents, and others, must fulfill a range of legal requirements. These include conducting risk assessment, establishing internal safeguards, appointing a money laundering officer, and adhering to record-keeping and retention obligations.
  • High Penalties for Non-Compliance: The German GwG stipulates high penalties for violations of these regulations. Notably, these penalties can be imposed even without a real case of money laundering or terrorism financing. Merely failing to comply with preventive measures and duties is sufficient to justify sanctions.

The Importance of Compliance

  • Preventive Approach: The German GwG adopts a preventive approach aimed at stopping money laundering and terrorism financing before they can occur. Strict compliance with legal provisions helps to identify and mitigate potential risks early on.
  • Compliance as a Protective Measure: Therefore, it is imperative for obligated entities to implement effective compliance systems. This includes not only adhering to formal regulations but also creating a corporate culture that promotes compliance and ethical behavior.

Conclusion

Understanding and complying with the provisions of the German GwG are essential for obligated entities to minimize the risk of high penalties. This is the case even in the absence of actual cases of money laundering or terrorism financing. Thus, a proactive compliance strategy is not just a legal necessity but also a crucial part of risk management and protecting the company’s reputation.

Some examples of fines

Sources:

https://www.bafin.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/Aufsichtsrecht/dl_gwg_en.html

https://www.bafin.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/EN/Auslegungsentscheidung/dl_ae_auas_gw2021_en.html

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert